Make the right decision for you!
It’s no secret that good pair of brows can make your face. Whether they’re thick or thin, eyebrows frame your face and make a huge difference in the all important facial harmony. So Brow Lamination vs Microblading? Both popular beauty services that are taking the streets by storm, so let’s explore pros and cons of each.
Microblading
Microblading is a semi-permanent tattooing technique that uses a small blade to deposit pigment under the skin’s surface in the form of fine hair strokes. This technique can create the appearance of fuller brows that will last for up to 2 years.
Microblading is a low maintenance procedure. After the initial top up, you can have perfect brows for up to 2 years, which is why it’s the more expensive of the two. If you have very little brows, Microblading can add strokes in to appear thicker.
Lamination
Brow lamination is a procedure that makes the eyebrows look fuller and more defined. A chemical solution is applied to the brows which is then combed into place to create a sculpted look. The result are a glossy, natural-looking finish that can last for up to 6 weeks so regular maintenance is required. The harsh chemicals require oil to be regularly rubbed into brows, to prevent bristle, dry hairs.
Brow lamination is a non-invasive procedure that doesn’t involve any needles or ink. This makes it a safer and less painful option than microblading. However, brow lamination may not work well for people with very thin or sparse brows, as the process relies on existing hair to create the desired shape and thickness.
So… if any at all, what will it be, Microblading Vs. Brow Lamination? Overall, both options have their pros and cons, and the best choice will depend on individual preferences and desired results.
Hit the link to find out more info/ book today https://just-browsing.co.uk/
